Sunday, January 24, 2016

The odd ones out.

Here in America, the second amendment of the Constitution states that we as citizens have a right to bear arms. Now, as Family Guy has once joked, this does not mean that we have a right to have a pair of bear's arms on display within our homes. What it does mean is that we have a right to have a firearm within our possession, presumably for self-defense. Now a large debate within our country (and a hot topic for presidential debates) is what we are to do about our gun laws, as there are some people who decide to use this right for more than self defense. There are people who use it to take over government buildings (Bundy Militia in Oregon), and plenty of mass shootings that take place in the US, which, as you can imagine, is not the intent of the second amendment. Now, the question is what are we going to do about it?

In all honesty, America's officials need to crack down on gun laws and background checks immediately. Guns are useful for a lot of things for a lot of people, hunting, self defense, etc., and they should definitely continue to be used for those things, but for those things only. America needs to put in place more in-depth background checks onto whoever is looking to buy a gun, in order to assure that whoever is buying it is mentally and criminally sound. This is exactly what Australia does, and they haven't gotten a mass shooting since 1996, because their minister completely cracked down on who could buy and sell guns.Why America hasn't taken the hint yet? I'm not entirely sure.

2 comments:

  1. I like the way you posed questions in your original argument, and I think they really helped you get your point across. I do think that you could have elaborated on these questions more, however, to explain in more detail the general feeling toward guns in America.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with your standpoint on this very important topic, though I think it is hard to say that the absence of mass shootings in Australia is strictly due to the laws. When were they established? What is considered to be a ¨mass murder¨? I do think that it has probably helped immensely, this data just seems a bit vague.

    ReplyDelete